Colors for the Fool

Languages & Reach

Language Reach

Today's lucky color, drawn from the tarot. To decide which languages should carry its stories, we measured each language four ways: the people who speak it, the people online, the words on the web, and the hours spent there.

✦
67.6%
of the world's population, by speakers
Ethnologue 2026 / UN population estimate
77%
of internet users
Internet World Stats, March 2020
83.5%
of websites, by content language
W3Techs, 3 October 2026
~70%
of daily time online
Claude estimate, October 2026

People who speak several languages, and sites written in several languages, are counted once for each language.

I · Speakers

Speakers (first and second language)

The world's top 20 languages, in millions of speakers. Ethnologue 2026. Traditional and Simplified Chinese are counted once, as Mandarin.

On the siteNot yet

II · Internet users

Internet users

Share of all internet users. Internet World Stats, March 2020, which is still the latest published count of users by language. It lists only the top 10.

III · Web content

Web content

Share of websites whose language could be identified. W3Techs, 3 October 2026. English alone is half the web.

IV · Attention

Total hours online per day

People who mainly read the language online × average daily hours, in billions of hours per day. Claude's estimate from DataReportal 2025–2026 country figures. How India and the Philippines are split between languages moves these numbers a lot.

V · Where attention outruns content

Attention against content

Up: daily hours online. Across: share of websites. Both scales are logarithmic. The further up and left, the more time people spend online in that language compared with how much is written in it.

Arabic gets 2.3 billion hours a day online, yet only 0.6% of websites are in Arabic. Chinese, Indonesian, Portuguese and Spanish sit on the same side. New languages should come from this upper-left corner.

Hindi (1.74 billion hours), Bengali, Urdu, Thai (510 million hours) and Filipino are not in the top 20 for web content (under 0.6%), so they would sit further left than this chart reaches.